4.5 Article

Inflammation and frailty measures in older people

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 9B, Pages 3103-3109

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00733.x

Keywords

aged; 80 and over; frail elderly; inflammation; tumour necrosis factor-alpha; C-reactive protein; interleukin-6

Funding

  1. Peel Medical Research Trust, London

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inflammation in patients defined as frail by Fried's phenotypic definition may be related to sarcopenia. This study aimed to investigate inflammation in older patients across different frailty criteria. Frailty status was determined in 110 patients aged over 75 years (mean 83.9 years) according to function (dependent, intermediate, independent); Fried (three or more items of exhaustion, weight loss, slow walking speed, low handgrip strength, low physical activity) and Frailty Index (a measure of accumulated deficits). With increasing patient frailty as defined by function and by Fried phenotype, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) increased significantly. Albumin was lowest in the frailest subjects by each definition. The greatest differences were seen between intermediate and dependent groups and between the pre-frail and frail. Adjustment for multiple covariates (age, sex, BMI category, smoking status, number of co-morbidities and number of prescribed medications) did not account for any of the observed differences in levels of inflammatory markers. The Frailty Index correlated significantly with log-transformed CRP (r = 0.221, P < 0.05), log-transformed IL-6 (r = 0.369, P < 0.01), TNF-alpha (r = 0.379, P < 0.01) and inversely with albumin (r = - 0.545, P < 0.01). This study provides further evidence linking inflammation and frailty in older people, an association that seems consistent across different frailty measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available