4.5 Article

The role of mitotic kinases in coupling the centrosome cycle with the assembly of the mitotic spindle

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 127, Issue 19, Pages 4111-4122

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.151753

Keywords

Cell cycle; Centrosome cycle; Centriole; Pericentriolar material; Mitotic kinase; Spindle assembly

Categories

Funding

  1. State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2010CB833705, 2014CB138402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31030044, 91313302, 31371365]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The centrosome acts as the major microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) for cytoskeleton maintenance in interphase and mitotic spindle assembly in vertebrate cells. It duplicates only once per cell cycle in a highly spatiotemporally regulated manner. When the cell undergoes mitosis, the duplicated centrosomes separate to define spindle poles and monitor the assembly of the bipolar mitotic spindle for accurate chromosome separation and the maintenance of genomic stability. However, centrosome abnormalities occur frequently and often lead to monopolar or multipolar spindle formation, which results in chromosome instability and possibly tumorigenesis. A number of studies have begun to dissect the role of mitotic kinases, including NIMA-related kinases (Neks), cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), Polo-like kinases (Plks) and Aurora kinases, in regulating centrosome duplication, separation and maturation and subsequent mitotic spindle assembly during cell cycle progression. In this Commentary, we review the recent research progress on how these mitotic kinases are coordinated to couple the centrosome cycle with the cell cycle, thus ensuring bipolar mitotic spindle fidelity. Understanding this process will help to delineate the relationship between centrosomal abnormalities and spindle defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available