4.5 Article

Mena invasive (MenaINV) promotes multicellular streaming motility and transendothelial migration in a mouse model of breast cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 124, Issue 13, Pages 2120-2131

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.086231

Keywords

Breast cancer; Cell motility; Intravital imaging; Metastasis; Transendothelial migration

Categories

Funding

  1. Ludwig Fund
  2. DoD CDMRP BCRP [BC087781]
  3. Ludwig Center at MIT [NIH-GM58801]
  4. ICBP [U54 CA112967]
  5. Charles H. Revson Fellowship
  6. [NIH-CA100324]
  7. [NIH-CA126511]
  8. [NIH-CA150344]
  9. [NIH-CA77522]
  10. CDMRP [544864, BC087781] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have shown previously that distinct Mena isoforms are expressed in invasive and migratory tumor cells in vivo and that the invasion isoform (Mena(INV)) potentiates carcinoma cell metastasis in murine models of breast cancer. However, the specific step of metastatic progression affected by this isoform and the effects on metastasis of the Mena11a isoform, expressed in primary tumor cells, are largely unknown. Here, we provide evidence that elevated Mena(INV) increases coordinated streaming motility, and enhances transendothelial migration and intravasation of tumor cells. We demonstrate that promotion of these early stages of metastasis by Mena(INV) is dependent on a macrophage-tumor cell paracrine loop. Our studies also show that increased Mena11a expression correlates with decreased expression of colony-stimulating factor 1 and a dramatically decreased ability to participate in paracrine-mediated invasion and intravasation. Our results illustrate the importance of paracrine-mediated cell streaming and intravasation on tumor cell dissemination, and demonstrate that the relative abundance of Mena(INV) and Mena11a helps to regulate these key stages of metastatic progression in breast cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available