4.5 Article

Ligand modulation of REV-ERBα function resets the peripheral circadian clock in a phasic manner

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 121, Issue 21, Pages 3629-3635

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.035048

Keywords

Nuclear hormone receptor; Circadian clock; Resetting; Phase response curve

Categories

Funding

  1. BBSRC (UK)
  2. GSK
  3. BBSRC [BB/D004357/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D004357/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nuclear receptor REV-ERB alpha is a key negative-feedback regulator of the biological clock. REV-ERB alpha binds to ROR elements of the Bmal1 (Arntl) promoter and represses Bmal1 transcription. This stabilizing negative loop is important for precise control of the circadian pacemaker. In the present study, we identified a novel synthetic REV-ERB alpha ligand, which enhances the recruitment of nuclear receptor co-repressor ( NCoR) to REV-ERB alpha. In order to explore REV-ERB alpha action on resetting responses of the molecular clock, we first established the rhythmic transcription profile and expression level of REV-ERB alpha in Rat-1 fibroblasts. When applied at different phases of the circadian oscillation to cell models containing stably transfected Bmal1::Luc or Per2::Luc, the REV-ERB alpha ligand induced phase-dependent bi-directional phase shifts. When the phase changes were plotted against time, a clear phase response curve was revealed, with a significant peak-to-trough amplitude of ca. 5 hours. The phase-resetting effect was also observed when the compound was applied to primary lung fibroblasts and ectopic lung slices from transgenic PER2::Luc mice. Therefore, similar regulation of REV-ERB alpha function by endogenous ligands, such as heme, is likely to be an important mechanism for clock resetting. In addition, we identify a new means to generate phasic shifts in the clock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available