4.7 Article

New histone supply regulates replication fork speed and PCNA unloading

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 204, Issue 1, Pages 29-43

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201305017

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. European Research Council [ERC2011StG]
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF82]
  5. Danish Medical Research Council
  6. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  7. Fabrikant Vilhelm Pedersen og Hustrus Mindelegat
  8. Seventh Framework Programme Marie Curie Actions Initial Training Networks Nucleosome4D and aDDRess
  9. Ligue Contre le Cancer (equipe labellisee)
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  11. Institut National du Cancer
  12. Lundbeck Foundation [R22-2007-1245] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correct duplication of DNA sequence and its organization into chromatin is central to genome function and stability. However, it remains unclear how cells coordinate DNA synthesis with provision of new histones for chromatin assembly to ensure chromosomal stability. In this paper, we show that replication fork speed is dependent on new histone supply and efficient nucleosome assembly. Inhibition of canonical histone biosynthesis impaired replication fork progression and reduced nucleosome occupancy on newly synthesized DNA. Replication forks initially remained stable without activation of conventional checkpoints, although prolonged histone deficiency generated DNA damage. PCNA accumulated on newly synthesized DNA in cells lacking new histones, possibly to maintain opportunity for CAF-1 recruitment and nucleosome assembly. Consistent with this, in vitro and in vivo analysis showed that PCNA unloading is delayed in the absence of nucleosome assembly. We propose that coupling of fork speed and PCNA unloading to nucleosome assembly provides a simple mechanism to adjust DNA replication and maintain chromatin integrity during transient histone shortage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available