4.4 Article

Geographical Distribution of Myasthenia Gravis in Northern Europe - Results from a Population-Based Study from Two Countries

Journal

NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 221-231

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000431036

Keywords

Myasthenia gravis, prevalence; Muscle specific tyrosine kinase antibody; Acetylcholine receptor antibody; Late-onset myasthenia gravis; Phenotype

Funding

  1. FIGHT-MG EU FP7 frame program [242210]
  2. Euromyasthenia EU FP7 [2005105]
  3. Unifor.no
  4. Wilhelmsen's foundation
  5. Princes Beatrix foundation
  6. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies
  7. Valsoe's foundation
  8. Norwegian association for patients with muscle disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To compare the prevalence of myasthenia gravis (MG) subgroups based on immunological markers and clinical presentation in two geographically complete MG populations in northern Europe. Methods:This cross-sectional study included all living MG patients in Norway and a regional cohort from the Netherlands. Patients were identified using their hospital registration codes. Medical charts of subjects >16 years were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were clinical MG, a positive antibody test for acetylcholine receptor (AChR MG) or muscle-specific kinase (MuSK MG), or if seronegative MG, confirmed by an electrophysiological test. Results: 1,205 MG patients (534 Norwegians and 671 Dutch) fulfilled the criteria, giving a higher point prevalence in the Netherlands (167/million, 95% CI 155-180) than in Norway (138/million, 95% CI 126-150). In particular, rates of AChR MG (143 vs. 111/million), MuSK MG (6.5 vs. 0.5/million), and ocular phenotype (62 vs. 24/million) were higher in the Netherlands. Conclusion: Novel findings are an AChR MG geographical north south gradient and a 2.6-fold more ocular MG patients in the Netherlands than in Norway. The MuSK MG latitudinal gradient supports the notion of a north south gradient in Europe, with a higher prevalence in the south. The variation is probably explained by genetic differences between the populations, in addition to environmental interactions. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available