4.7 Article

Pygo2 expands mammary progenitor cells by facilitating histone H3 K4 methylation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 5, Pages 811-826

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200810133

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH04-1-0516]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01-AR47320, K02-AR51482, R01 CA127857, P01 CA30195]
  3. National Key Research Project of Basic Sciences of China [973 project 2006CB708507]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30671173]
  5. California Breast Cancer Research Program (CBCRP) postdoctoral fellowship [14FB-0129]
  6. CBCRP award [10-FB-0116]
  7. Children's Hospital Los Angeles fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have unequivocally identified multipotent stem/progenitor cells in mammary glands, offering a tractable model system to unravel genetic and epigenetic regulation of epithelial stem/progenitor cell development and homeostasis. In this study, we show that Pygo2, a member of an evolutionarily conserved family of plant homeo domain-containing proteins, is expressed in embryonic and postnatal mammary progenitor cells. Pygo2 deficiency, which is achieved by complete or epithelia-specific gene ablation in mice, results in defective mammary morphogenesis and regeneration accompanied by severely compromised expansive self-renewal of epithelial progenitor cells. Pygo2 converges with Wnt/beta-catenin signaling on progenitor cell regulation and cell cycle gene expression, and loss of epithelial Pygo2 completely rescues. beta-catenin-induced mammary outgrowth. We further describe a novel molecular function of Pygo2 that is required for mammary progenitor cell expansion, which is to facilitate K4 trimethylation of histone H3, both globally and at Wnt/beta-catenin target loci, via direct binding to K4-methyl histone H3 and recruiting histone H3 K4 methyltransferase complexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available