4.6 Article

Recognition of facial sketch styles

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 1188-1197

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.09.009

Keywords

Handwritten features; Selective ensemble; Sketch; Style recognition; SVM

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61125204, 61172146]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [K5051202048, BDZ021403, JB149901]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of China [IRT13088]
  4. Shaanxi Innovative Research Team for Key Science and Technology [2012KCT-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The style recognition of facial sketches drawn by artists contributes great to the painting authentication, digital entertainment and law enforcement. This paper presents a framework to automatically classify different styles of facial sketches based on support vector machines (SVM) and selective ensemble (SE) strategy. Some handwritten features are deployed to feed into SVM classifiers. The framework proceeds as follows: firstly, each geometrically normalized image is divided into five important parts: the whole image, left eye, right eye, nose, and mouth; Secondly, based on the analysis to the technique of the facial sketch artists, gray histogram, gray moment, speeded up robust feature and multiscale local binary patterns are explored to extract handwritten features from each part; Thirdly. SVM is explored to learn the mapping relationship from handwritten features of each part to the style of the artist and thus we obtain multiple classification scores; Finally, we combine these complementary classification scores via SE scheme. Our model is able to achieve the recognition rates of 94% and 96% respectively on two groups of sketches drawn by five artists which would be available on the website. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available