4.8 Article

Mitigating coking during methylcyclohexane transformation on HZSM-5 zeolites with additional porosity

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages 118-126

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.10.001

Keywords

Hierarchical ZSM-5; Methylcyclohexane; Deactivation; Coke location; Crystallite size

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency, ANR, (HiZeCoke Project) [2010 BLAN 723]
  2. Region Basse-Normandie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of two different hierarchization procedures (alkaline and fluoride leaching) on the performances of ZSM-5 catalysts in the transformation of methylcyclohexane at 723 K are highlighted and discussed in relation to their porosities. The hierarchical catalysts exhibit different porosities; namely, the fluoride treatment leads to a zeolite combining micropores and macropores, while alkaline leaching adds mesopores interconnected with the native micropores. While the initial activities and selectivities of catalysts derived from the three zeolites are very similar in the conversion of methylcyclohexane, the presence of mesopores (alkaline leaching), close to the active sites, greatly improves the stability of such a hierarchical catalyst by favoring the desorption of products. This behavior is similar to a reduction in zeolite crystal size. This increased stability is not due to a decrease of the coke toxicity, but rather to an inhibition of the growth of coke precursors, in turn related to the shorter diffusion paths of reactants and products. Two types of coke are present on the meso-/micro-porous zeolite: (i) a light coke composed of alkylbenzenes strongly adsorbed on Lewis acid sites and silanols, (ii) a heavy coke (alkylphenanthrenes and alkylpyrenes) trapped at the intersection of the zeolite channels. While the light coke has no impact on the catalyst stability, the heavy coke poisons active sites, most probably remote from the mesopores. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available