4.8 Article

Reaction mechanisms of CO2 electrochemical reduction on Cu(111) determined with density functional theory

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 312, Issue -, Pages 108-122

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.01.013

Keywords

CO2 electroreduction; Cu electrodes; Cu(111); Density functional theory; Electrochemical; Solvation; Kinetic barrier; Reaction mechanism

Funding

  1. Center for Atomic Level Catalyst Design, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional theory (DFT) was used to determine the potential-dependent reaction free energies and activation barriers for several reaction paths of carbon dioxide (CO2) electrochemical reduction on the Cu(1 1 1) surface. The role of water solvation on CO2 reduction paths was explored by evaluating waterassisted surface hydrogenation and proton (H) shuttling with various solvation models. Electrochemical O-H bond formation reactions occur through water-assisted H-shuttling, whereas C H bond formation occurs with negligible H2O involvement via direct reaction with adsorbed H* on the Cu(1 1 1) surface. The DFT-computed kinetic path shows that the experimentally observed production of methane and ethylene on Cu(1 1 1) catalysts occurs through the reduction of carbon monoxide (CO*) to a hydroxymethylidyne (COH*) intermediate. Methane is produced from the reduction of the COH* to C* and then sequential hydrogenation. Ethylene production shares the COH* path with methane production, where the methane to ethylene selectivity depends on CH2*, and H* coverages. The reported potential-dependent activation barriers provide kinetics consistent with observed experimental reduction overpotentials and selectivity to methane and ethylene over methanol for the electroreduction of CO2 on Cu catalysts. (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available