4.8 Article

MoS2 nanoparticle morphologies in hydrodesulfurization catalysis studied by scanning tunneling microscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages 306-318

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.08.017

Keywords

Scanning tunneling microscopy; Hydrodesulfurization; Surface science; Hydrotreating; MoS2; Nanoparticle morphology

Funding

  1. Haldor Topsoe A/S
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation
  4. Carlsberg Foundation
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [239834, 227430]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [227430] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Information on the morphology and edge structures of single-layer MoS2 and promoted CoMoS nanoparticles is essential in order to understand and accurately model the activity in hydrodesulfurization catalysis. Only the edge sites in single-layer MoS2 nanoparticles are known to be active in catalysis, but since different edge structures are possible, the activity and selectivity may depend critically on the exact morphology. From atom-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) experiments, we provide here a general overview of the atomic-scale effect of sulfo-reductive atmospheres, sulfiding agents, promoter atoms, and support type on the equilibrium morphology of single-layer MoS2. Overall strong morphology variations are seen. These variations are interpreted in the framework of the Wulff construction as differences in edge energies induced by the conditions of the experiment. The results highlight the STM as an increasingly. important experimental technique to investigate the atomic-scale structure of catalytically active nanoparticles in general and as one of the only tools, which can address single atom defects and single adsorption events on the atomic-scale. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available