4.8 Article

Microkinetic modeling of the decarboxylation and decarbonylation of propanoic acid over Pd(111) model surfaces based on parameters obtained from first principles

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 305, Issue -, Pages 56-66

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.04.026

Keywords

Propanoic acid; Palladium; Density functional theory; Deoxygenation; Decarbonylation; Decarboxylation; Microkinetic modeling

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE1153012]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences Division [DE-SC0007167]
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy
  4. TeraGrid [TG-CTS090100]
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1153012] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have studied the reaction mechanism of deoxygenation of propanoic acid to alkanes over Pd(111) model surfaces by a combination of microkinetic modeling and density functional theory calculations. Approximate, coverage-dependent adsorption energies of CO and H have been implemented in a microkinetic model that shows that the decarbonylation mechanism is slightly preferred over the decarboxylation mechanism at various H-2 partial pressures. The most significant decarbonylation pathway proceeds via dehydrogenation of the acid to yield CH3CHCOOH which illustrates the important role of a-carbon dehydrogenation steps, followed by dehydroxylation to yield CH3CHCO which further dehydrogenates to CHCHCO. Finally, facile C-CO bond scission occurs to yield CO and acetylene which gets hydrogenated to ethane. Overall, the dehydroxylation of CH3CHCOOH and to a lower degree the removal of the hydrocarbon pool from the surface and the dehydrogenation of the alpha-carbon of the reactant are found to be the rate-controlling steps. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available