4.8 Article

Hydrogenation of acetophenone derivatives: Tuning the enantioselectivity via the metal-support interaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 278, Issue 1, Pages 94-101

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.11.025

Keywords

Metal-support interaction; Acetophenone derivatives; Asymmetric hydrogenation; Platinum; Cinchonidine

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. ETH [TH-09 06-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of acidic and basic supports on the enantioselective hydrogenation of acetophenone and its aryl-substituted derivates was studied. The Pt/Al2O3, Pt/Al2O3-SiO2, and Pt/Al2O3-Cs2O catalysts were prepared by single-step flame spray pyrolysis, and cinchonidine (CD) was used as chiral modifier. For all five aromatic ketones, the acidic support improved the ee, while the basic support diminished it. Opposite tendencies were observed for the reaction rate: acidic support lowered and basic support enhanced the rate of ketone conversion. In situ investigation of the hydrogenation of the quinoline ring of CD revealed for the first time that degradation of the modifier leads to remarkable variation in the substrate/modifier ratio. This effect and a possible catalyst deactivation due to aldol condensation of the ketones may be the origin of the decrease in ee with conversion. Following the diastereoselectivity during hydrogenation of the heteroaromatic ring of the quinoline unit of CD proved dominantly pro(S) adsorption mode on Pt/Al2O3 and Pt/Al2O3-SiO2, and pro(R) on Pt/Al2O3-Cs2O catalysts. Changes in the adsorption mode were minor during hydrogenation of aromatic ketones. This, together with the small effect of ketones on the hydrogenation rate of CD, is interpreted as an indication to weak substrate-modifier interactions, in contrast to the situation during the hydrogenation of alpha-ketoesters (methyl benzoylformate). (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available