4.8 Article

CO oxidation on Au/FePO4 catalyst: Reaction pathways and nature of Au sites

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 266, Issue 1, Pages 98-105

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2009.05.019

Keywords

Au catalyst; FePO4; Iron phosphate; CO adsorption; Catalytic CO oxidation; Redox; FTIR; Raman spectroscopy; XANES; Mechanism

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC02-98CH10886, DE-FG02-05ER15688]
  2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In situ FTIR spectroscopy coupled with downstream mass spectrometry has been used to clarify the pathways for room temperature (rt) CO oxidation over iron phosphate-supported Au catalyst. The charge state of Au on Au/FePO4 after calcination, reduction, or under reaction conditions was assessed by both FTIR spectroscopy (CO probing) and X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES). Results from both approaches show that cationic gold species dominate the surface after pretreatment in O-2 at 200 degrees C. A portion of the cationic gold on Au/FePO4 can be reduced by the initial CO adsorption at rt, and subsequently repeated CO exposures do not reduce the remaining cationic Au. FIR and Raman results from cycled CO reduction and O-2 reoxidation of Au/FePO4 indicate that there are active structural oxygen species on the surface of Au/FePO4 that can be consumed by CO and then replenished by gaseous O-2 at rt. Au activates both CO and O-2 so that the FePO4 Support can undergo reduction (by CO) and reoxidation (by O-2) cycles. The results of CO oxidation with labeled O-18(2) suggest the operation of two parallel reaction pathways at rt: (1) a redox pathway in which FePO4 supplies active oxygen and (2) a direct pathway on metallic Au, via either Langmuir-Hinshelwood or Eley-Rideal mechanism, in which gas phase O-2 provides the active oxygen. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available