4.8 Article

Shape-selective n-alkane hydroconversion at exterior zeolite surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 256, Issue 1, Pages 95-107

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.03.004

Keywords

Ostwald coefficient; adsorption thermodynamics; solution thermodynamics; TON-; MTT-; CHA-; ERI-type zeolites; alkane hydroconversion; shape selectivity; exterior zeolite surface catalysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A critical review of the adsorption and catalysis of n- and methylalkanes demonstrates that the interior surface of TON- and MTT-type zeolites dominates both adsorption and catalysis, and that the contribution from the exterior surface is negligible. For both n- and methylalkane isomers, the experimental Henry constants at the interior TON-type zeolite surface are more than an order of magnitude greater than those at the exterior surface. Molecular simulations on exclusively interior TON-type silica surface reproduce the adsorption isotherms of n- and methylalkane isomers remarkably well and suggest that even an isomer as bulky as 2,3-dimethylpentane could have access to the interior TON-type zeolite surface. Only the reference state used in solution thermodynamics affords an equitable comparison between internal and external surface thermodynamics. It indicates that methylalkanes adsorb in a structured fashion at the exterior TON-type zeolite surface when the interior surface is inaccessible. But the entropic penalty for this organized exterior surface pore mouth or key-lock adsorption is high, so that methylalkanes prefer adsorption at the interior surface when it is accessible. We speculate that CHA- and ERI-type sieves exhibit exterior surface catalysis in long n-alkane conversion, but the database remains too small to allow investigation of the full potential of shape selectivity in exterior zeolite surface catalysis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available