4.4 Article

Atrial-selective Prolongation of Refractory Period With AVE0118 is Due Principally to Inhibition of Sodium Channel Activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 539-546

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31824e1b93

Keywords

pharmacology; electrophysiology; atrial fibrillation; sodium channel blocker

Funding

  1. Gilead Sciences
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Merck
  4. Cardiome
  5. Buchang Group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The action of AVE0118 to prolong effective refractory period (ERP) in atria but not in ventricles is thought to be due to its inhibition of I-Kur. However, in nonremodeled atria, AVE0118 prolongs ERP but not action potential duration (APD(70-90)), which can be explained with the inhibition of sodium but not potassium channel current. ERP, APD, and the maximum rate of increase of the AP upstroke (V-max) were measured in the canine-isolated coronary-perfused right atrial and in superfused ventricular tissue preparations. Whole-cell patch-clamp techniques were used to measure sodium channel current in HEK293 cells stably expressing SCN5A. AVE0118 (5-10 mu M) prolonged ERP (P < 0.001) but not APD(70) and decreased V-max (by 15%, 10 mu M, P < 0.05; n = 10 for each). Ventricular ERP, APD(90), and V-max were not changed significantly by 10 mM AVE0118 (all P = ns; n = 7). AVE0118 effectively suppressed acetylcholine-mediated persistent atrial fibrillation. AVE0118 (10 mu M) reduced peak current amplitude of SCN5A-WT current by 36.5% +/- 6.6% (P < 0.01; n = 7) and shifted half-inactivation voltage (V-0.5) of the steady-state inactivation curve from -89.9 +/- 0.5 to -96.0 +/- 0.9 mV (P < 0.01; n = 7). Our data suggest that AVE0118-induced prolongation of atrial, but not ventricular ERP, is due largely to atrial-selective depression of sodium channel current, which likely contributes to the effectiveness of AVE0118 to suppress atrial fibrillation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available