4.4 Article

Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibition With Saxagliptin Enhanced Nitric Oxide Release and Reduced Blood Pressure and sICAM-1 Levels in Hypertensive Rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 467-473

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31826be204

Keywords

saxagliptin; endothelium; nitric oxide; nitric oxide synthase; hypertension

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Astra Zeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most patients with diabetes also have hypertension, a risk factor associated with atherothrombotic disease and characterized by endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction and loss of nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Recent studies suggest a possible antihypertensive effect with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibition; however, the underlying mechanism is not understood. In this study, we tested the effects of the DPP4 inhibitor, saxagliptin, on EC function, blood pressure, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) levels in hypertensive rats. Spontaneously hypertensive rats were treated with vehicle or saxagliptin (10 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) for 8 weeks. NO and peroxynitrite (ONOO-) release from aortic and glomerular ECs was stimulated with calcium ionophore and measured using electrochemical nanosensor technology. Changes in EC function were correlated with fasting glucose levels. Saxagliptin treatment was observed to increase aortic and glomerular NO release by 22% (P<0.001) and 23% (P<0.001), respectively, with comparable reductions in ONOO- levels; the NO/ONOO- ratio increased by >50% in both EC types (P<0.001) as compared with vehicle. Saxagliptin also reduced mean arterial pressure from 170 +/- 10 to 158 +/- 10 mm Hg (P<0.001) and decreased sICAM-1 levels by 37% (P<0.01). The results of this study suggest that DPP4 inhibition reduces blood pressure and inflammation in hypertensive rats while increasing NO bioavailability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available