4.4 Article

Markers of Cholesterol Absorption and Synthesis Predict the Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Response to Atorvastatin

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages 396-401

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181f09bcb

Keywords

statin; cholesterol metabolism; lipids; cholesterol; personalized medicine

Funding

  1. Pfizer Australia [AUS-ATO-06-002]
  2. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [409936]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Genetic loci predict <5% of variation in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) response to statins. Cholestanol and desmosterol are plasma markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis, respectively. Because statins lower LDL-C by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis, we studied the relationship between cholestanol and desmosterol and LDL-C response to atorvastatin. Methods: High-risk patients were treated with 80 mg of atorvastatin for 6 weeks. LDL-C response to atorvastatin was related to baseline cholestanol to cholesterol ratio (CCR) and desmosterol. The following comparisons were used: (1) correlates of percentage LDL-C response, (2) baseline characteristics of hyperresponders versus hyporesponders, and (3) binary logistic regression analysis for predictors of achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Results: One hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled of which 118 completed the study with adequate adherence. Average LDL-C reduction was 57% +/- 13% (mean +/- SD). On univariate analysis, desmosterol and CCR correlated with percentage LDL-C reduction and multivariate modeling explained approximately 16% of the variation in response. Atorvastatin hyperresponders had higher mean desmosterol (P = 0.046) and lower CCR (P = 0.035) than hyporesponders. On logistic regression analysis for the outcome of achieved LDL-C of <70 mg/dL, baseline LDL-C and CCR were significant predictors; odds ratios were 0.932 and 0.979, respectively. Conclusions: CCR and desmosterol explain more variation in LDL-C response to statin than that reported with pharmacogenomics. CCR and desmosterol may guide lipid-lowering therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available