4.4 Article

Hemodynamic and Cardiac Neurotransmitter-releasing Effects in Conscious Dogs of Attention- and Wake-promoting Agents: A Comparison of d-Amphetamine, Atomoxetine, Modafinil, and a Novel Quinazolinone H-3 Inverse Agonist

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 52-59

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318195a470

Keywords

amphetamine; modafinil; atomoxetine; histamine H-3 receptor inverse agonist

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conscious coronary sinus-cannulated dogs were used to assess the hemodynamic effects and local cardiac norepinephrine (NE) and histamine (HA) release of 4 mechanistically diverse agents either clinically approved or representing a potential novel mechanism for the promotion of wakefulness or attention. Dosing regimens were based on reported or concurrently determined wake-promoting activities in canine models. The central nervous system stimulant, d-amphetamine [0.1 mg.kg(-1).10 min(-1) intravenous (IV)], significantly elevated mean arterial pressure (+30%) and increased coronary sinus and peripheral venous NE concentrations, indicative of cardiac neurotransmitter release. The selective NE reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine (2.0 mg.kg(-1).10 min(-1) IV) and modafinil (30.0 mg.kg(-1).10 min(-1) IV) also significantly elevated mean arterial pressure (+15% and +30%, respectively), but with no effect on coronary sinus or peripheral NE concentration, Suggesting central mechanisms underlying the hemodynamic effects. The preclinical demonstrations of pressor effects with d-amphetamine, atomoxetine, and modafinil are consistent with clinically reported hemodynamic effects with these agents. The quinazolinone RA receptor subtype H-3 inverse agonist 5r (0.3 mg.kg(-1).10 min(-1) IV) displayed no effect on hemodynamics or on coronary sinus or peripheral NE and HA concentrations. These data suggest the potential for therapeutic effect with the latter mechanism in the absence of peripheral cardiac neurotransmitter release or obvious changes in cardiovascular function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available