4.2 Article

Do Beta-Blockers Impact Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Testing in Patients at Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmias? A Meta-Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1009-1014

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01757.x

Keywords

beta-blocker; microvolt T-wave alternans; cardiomyopathy; prognosis; sudden death

Funding

  1. NIH [K23]
  2. Cambridge Heart and serves
  3. Medtronic
  4. Boston Scientific
  5. St. Jude Medical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods and Results: Prospective studies that evaluated whether MTWA predicted ventricular arrhythmic events published between January 1980 and September 2008 were identified. Summary estimates for the predictive value of MTWA were derived with random-effects models. Nine studies involving 3,939 patients were identified. Overall, an abnormal MTWA (positive and indeterminate) test was associated with an almost 2-fold increased risk for arrhythmic events (pooled RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.29-2.96; P = 0.002). However, significant heterogeneity across studies was observed (P = 0.024). In the 4 studies in which beta-blocker therapy was not withheld prior to MTWA assessment, an abnormal MTWA test was associated with a 5-fold increased risk for arrhythmic events (pooled RR = 5.39, 95% CI: 2.68-10.84; P < 0.001) and was robust to sensitivity analyses. In contrast, the association was much weaker in those studies where the use of beta-blocker therapy was withheld prior to MTWA testing (pooled RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.06-1.84; P = 0.02). Conclusions: In primary prevention patients with left ventricular dysfunction, the predictive power of MTWA varied widely, based on whether beta-blocker therapy was withheld prior to its assessment. This observation may explain the inconsistent results of MTWA studies in this population. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1009-1014, September 2010).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available