4.6 Article

Learning from adaptive neural network control of an underactuated rigid spacecraft

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 690-697

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.05.055

Keywords

Underactuated rigid spacecraft; Attitude stabilization; RBF neural network; Deterministic learning; Learning control

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61304084]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2014J05078]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Longyan City [2013LY09]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Longyan University [LG2014005, LC2014005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, based on recently developed deterministic learning (DL) theory, we investigate the problem of stabilization for an underactuated rigid spacecraft with unknown system dynamics. Our objective is to learn the unknown underactuated system dynamics while tracking to a desired orbit and design the control law to achieve stabilization. First, the system dynamic and kinematic equations are given, the kinematic equation is described by the (w, z) parametrization. Second, an adaptive neural network (NN) controller with the employed radial basis function (RBF) is designed to guarantee the stability of the underactuated rigid spacecraft system and the tracking performance. The unknown dynamics of underactuated rigid spacecraft system can be approximated by NN in a local region and the learned knowledge is stored in constant RBF networks. The accessorial variables gamma 1 and gamma 2 are imported in the designing course of the control laws via backstepping method. Third, when repeating same or similar control tasks, the learned knowledge can be recalled and reused to achieve guaranteed stability with little effort. Finally, simulation studies are included to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available