4.3 Article

Myocardial strain of the left ventricle in normal children

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 1-2, Pages 145-149

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.01.015

Keywords

Myocardial strain; Children; Echocardiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There have been few reports regarding cardiac strain in children. The present study was performed to determine the reference values for circumferential and radial strains of the left ventricle in normal children and discern the relative influence of aging and cardiac growth on these left ventricular functional indices. Methods: The study population consisted of 180 children (aged 2 months to 21 years) who had normal cardiac function and normal cardiac load. None of the patients had symptoms, and none was receiving medical therapy. 2D cine-loop recordings of short-axis views at the papillary muscle level were stored for off-line analysis. Custom acoustic-tracking software was used to measure left ventricular strain. Continuous variables are reported as mean values +/- standard deviation. The correlation coefficients were calculated to identify the relative influences of aging on the strains. Tukey's test was used to assess differences in strain among the six-myocardial segments. In all analyses, p < 0.01 was taken to indicate statistical significance. Results and conclusions: The strains of all segments could be analyzed in 136 of 180 children. There were no significant age-related changes in circumferential or radial strain in children, but regional heterogeneity in left ventricular strain. The circumferential and radial strains showed inverse distributions; the circumferential strain in the region with low radial strain was high, and that in the region with high radial strain was low. These observations indicated there are differences among the three-dimensional movements of the regions. (C) 2012 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available