4.3 Article

Gender-specific differences in the clinical features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a community-based Japanese population: Results from Kochi RYOMA study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 314-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.07.004

Keywords

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Gender

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary myocardial disorder with a broad spectrum of clinical features. Although gender may be one of the important modifying factors in HCM, there has been little information on gender differences. Methods: We investigated gender-specific differences in the clinical features of HCM in a community-based Japanese population. We established cardiomyopathy registration in Kochi Prefecture named Kochi RYOMA study consisting of 9 hospitals as an unselected regional Japanese population. Results: 261 patients with diagnosis of HCM were registered. At registration, 88 patients (34%) were women. Female patients were more frequently diagnosed as having HCM at >= 65 years (41% versus 27%) and had a higher ratio of familial HCM (35% versus 19%). More female patients had diagnosis of HCM due to cardiac symptoms (64% versus 40%) and were symptomatic both at diagnosis and at registration. Although the prevalence of atrial fibrillation was not different between males and females, embolic events occurred less frequently in female patients at registration than in male patients (2% versus 10%). In female patients, there were more obstructive HCM patients and fewer patients with apical HCM. Left ventricular and left atrial diameters were smaller and fractional shortening was higher in females than in males. Conclusions: The manifestations of HCM in unselected Japanese patients differed in men and women, which suggest that hormonal, social, and genetic factors may influence the clinical presentation of HCM. (C) 2010 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available