4.5 Article

Relation Between Red Cell Distribution Width With Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients With Acute Heart Failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 517-522

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.01.002

Keywords

Red cell distribution width; N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; acute heart failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Red cell distribution width (RDW) has recently been discovered to be it novel prognostic marker in patients with heart failure. However, the relation between RDW and echocardiographic parameters ill acute heart failure (AHF) has not been Studied. Methods and Results: We analyzed laboratory findings including RDW. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and echocardiographic parameters in 100 patients with AHF. The mean RDW wits 14.2 +/- 2.0% and median NT-proBNP was 5 183 pg/mL. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.1 +/- 14.5% and early mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/E'), was 21.2 +/- 9.4. When the RDW was considered in tertile categories, the highest tertile group (> 14.5%) had higher E/E' (P < .001) and higher NT-proBNP (P = .02) than the lowest tertile group (< 13.2%). fit multiple linear regression analysis, RDW wits independently correlated with E/E' even after adjustment of other risk factors (beta-coefficient 0.431, P = .001). The optimal cutoff value of RDW for predicting E/E' > 15 suggesting elevated left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) was 13.45% (area under the Curve 0.633, P < .05). An additive power of RDW with NT-proBNP for predicting E/E' > 15 Was found ill logistic regression analysis (P = .038). Conclusions: We found it novel relation between hi,,her levels of RDW and elevated E/E' in patients with AHF. This novel finding raises the possibility that it simple marker. RDW may he associated with elevated LVFP in patients with AHF. (J Cardiac Fail 2009;15;517-522)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available