4.6 Article

Relative and disease-free survival for breast cancer in relation to subtype: a population-based study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 9, Pages 1569-1577

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-013-1478-1

Keywords

Breast cancer; HER2; Hormone receptor; Ki67; Population-based study; Survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Compagnia di San Paolo, Fondazione Cariplo Italy
  2. Centro Nazionale per la Prevenzione e il Controllo delle Malattie (CCM) of the Italian Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

No population-based study has investigated breast cancer (BC) subtypes defined by including Ki67. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative proportions of immunohistochemical subtypes and differences in relative and disease-free survival between subtypes, in relation to patient and other cancer characteristics in Italian BC patient. Information on estrogen, progesterone, human epidermal growth factor (HER2), Ki67, and relapses was obtained for 3,381 cases, sampled randomly and anonymously from cases diagnosed in 2003-2005 in nine Italian cancer registries. Relative excess risks (RERs) of death and risks of relapse 5 years after diagnosis were estimated. Luminal A cancers were 42 % of the total, luminal B 27 %, luminal-HER2 14 %, triple-negative 11 %, and HER2-enriched 7 %. For non-metastatic (3,302) cases, 4 and 7 % developed locoregional and distant metastases, respectively. RERs of death and risks of relapse were significantly greater for all cancer subtypes than luminal A, particularly for triple-negative and HER2-enriched cancers, which were more frequent in women < 40 years. Our population-based findings confirm that subtype is an independent prognostic factor for BC. Triple-negative and HER2-enriched subtypes would benefit from the development and wide application, respectively, of targeted treatments, which would also improve survival for younger patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available