4.6 Article

Prediction of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in the plasma/pleural effusion to efficacy of gefitinib treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue 9, Pages 1341-1347

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-010-0785-z

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer; Plasma; Pleural effusion; Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation; PCR

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [06DZ19502]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene were reported to correlate with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we attempted to detect EGFR mutations in plasma and pleural effusion samples and to make clear its correlations with gefitinib response and survival in NSCLC patients. The free DNA was isolated from the plasma of 56 cases and pleural effusion of another 32 cases of advanced NSCLC. Five common types of EGFR mutations were analyzed by LightCycle PCR with Taqman-MGB probes. EGFR gene mutations were found in 22 of all the 88 (25%) NSCLC patients (23.2% of 56 plasma samples, 28.1% of another 32 pleural effusion samples). EGFR mutations were more frequently present in females, never-smokers and adenocarcinomas (P < 0.01). It also showed that patients with EGFR mutations had a significantly better response rate when compared with that of the wild-type patients (P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (11.2 vs. 2.7 months P = 0.005) and overall survival (21.8 vs. 5.8 months P = 0.003) were significantly higher in patients with EGFR mutations than in patients with wild-type EGFR. The EGFR mutations in the serum and the pleural effusion from advanced NSCLC patients can be detected with LightCycle PCR using Taqman-MGB probes. The mutations highly predict the efficacy of gefitinib in advanced NSCLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available