4.6 Article

Second primary esophageal or lung cancer in patients with head and neck carcinoma in Taiwan: incidence and risk in relation to primary index tumor site

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages 115-123

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-010-0865-0

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; Second cancer; Betel quid chewing

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Council [NSC98-2314-B-182-029-MY2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Second primary cancer is prevalent in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), for which esophagus and lung are the most usual sites, associated with an extremely poor prognosis. However, information regarding the actual risk of second primary esophageal or lung cancer in South-east Asia, the betel-quid chewing area, has been restricted to data from single-institutions. We have therefore conducted a population-based study to evaluate the incidence, risk, and developmental time of second esophageal or lung cancer in HNC patients. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and cumulative incidences were calculated for second primary esophageal or lung cancer using a database from the Taiwan Cancer Registry that included 63,720 cases having an initial diagnosis of HNC. The risk of second esophageal cancer was increased in patients with oral/pharyngeal (SIR = 8.71, 95% CI 7.55-10.01) and laryngeal (SIR = 4.65, 95% CI 3.37-6.27) cancers, whereas second lung risk was increased in patients with laryngeal (SIR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.69-2.45) and oral/pharyngeal (SIR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.34-1.80) cancers. The risk excess was prominent for patients with a follow-up interval < 5 years and a first primary cancer diagnosed at age < 50. Nevertheless, patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were not associated with an excess risk in second esophageal or lung cancer. The present dataset provides definite evidence that there is a substantial excess risk of second primary esophageal or lung cancer for the index tumors of oral cavity, pharynx and larynx. The absence of risk excess found in nasopharyngeal carcinoma is also compatible with the existing knowledge that it might have an entirely distinctive etiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available