4.6 Article

Loss of GDF-15 abolishes Sulindac chemoprevention in the Apc(Min/+) mouse model of intestinal cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue 4, Pages 571-576

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-009-0691-4

Keywords

NSAID; Colon cancer; COX-2; Cytokine; TGF-beta

Categories

Funding

  1. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
  2. Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery
  3. Papanicolaou Corps for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growth-differentiation factor (GDF)-15, a member of the TGF-beta superfamily, is potently induced in the intestine following mechanical injury, genotoxic insult and following non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) exposure. GDF-15 expression correlates with apoptosis in intestinal cells and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer formation and the anti-tumor effects of NSAIDs. We sought to determine the effect of loss of Gdf15 on animal tumor models of hereditary colon cancer and in the NSAID-mediated prevention of heritable colorectal cancer. GDF-15 null (Gdf15 (-/-)) mice and mice with the genetic mutation found in hereditary poliposis coli, Apc (min/+) were bred. Gdf15 (-/-) , Apc (min/+) and Gdf15 (+/+) , Apc (min/+) mice were generated. In Gdf15 (-/-) , Apc (min/+) mice, intestinal neoplasia formation rate and size were indistinguishable from that in Gdf15 (+/+) , Apc (min/+) mice. Sulindac chemoprotection activity although potent in Gdf15 (+/+) , Apc (min/+) mice was abolished in Gdf15 (-/-) , Apc (min/+) mice. These results demonstrate in a murine model that GDF-15 does not significantly regulate heritable in vivo intestinal carcinogenesis but does mediate sulindac chemoprevention in heritable colon cancer. These data suggest that the use of GDF-15 activated signaling pathways may allow improved chemoprevention and therapies for colorectal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available