4.6 Article

Hypermethylated SFRP1, but none of other nine genes informative for western countries, is valuable for bladder cancer detection in mainland China

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 135, Issue 12, Pages 1717-1727

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-009-0619-z

Keywords

DNA methylation; SFRP1; Bladder cancer; Urine sediments; MSP

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai Science Foundation [07DJ14074]
  2. National Science Foundation [30570850, 10574134, 30872963]
  3. National Research Program for Basic Research of China [2004CB518804, 2009CB825606, 2009CB825607]
  4. European 6th program [LSHB-CT-2005-019067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 11-gene set by methylation-specific PCR in urine sediments for sensitive/specific detection of bladder cancer has been identified previously. In this study, we have evaluated 10 DNA methylation biomarkers that have been reported informative in western countries for bladder cancer diagnosis for a better set. The promoter CpG Islands of the following 10 genes: CDH1, FANCF, LOXL1, LOXL4, p16INK4, SFRP1, SOX9, TIG1, TIMP3, and XAF1 have been subjected to methylation-specific PCR analysis in the DNA of 2 bladder cancer cell lines, 2 normal bladder tissues and urine sediments of 82 bladder cancer patients, 15 non-cancerous urogenital patients and 5 healthy volunteers. Both XAF1 and LOXL1 genes were heterozygously methylated in the normal bladder tissues, showing no cancer state specificity. While the hypermethylated states were detected in urine sediments of bladder cancer at a frequency not less than 2.4% (2/82 cases), nine genes were also methylated in the patients of the non-cancerous urogenital diseases. The methylated SFRP1 was detected in 36.6% (30/82 cases) of bladder cancer and 6.7% (1/15 cases) of non-cancerous urogenital diseases, showing the bladder cancer specificity. Inclusion of the SFRP1 gene into a set of 11 genes has improved the bladder cancer detection. The insufficiency of predicting disease onset in this study with the previously recommended targets in western countries suggests a possible disease disparity between these two populations. Alternatively, the tissue-specific methylation might be mistaken as the cancer specific in the studies where no non-cancerous lesion controls were involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available