4.5 Article

Heroin abuse exaggerates age-related deposition of hyperphosphorylated tau and p62-positive inclusions

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 3100-3107

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.07.018

Keywords

Aging; alpha-Synuclein; Heroin; Neuropathology; Opiate; Tau; TDP-43; p62

Funding

  1. Hungarian Scientific Health Council [ETT-098/2009]
  2. National Institutes of Health [DA15446]
  3. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA)
  4. European Commission [278486]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The observation of increased hyperphosphorylated tau levels correlating with microglial activation in opiate abusers has been interpreted as predisposition to accelerated Alzheimer diseaseerelated changes. The present study focused on evaluating additional neurodegeneration-related proteins, including a-synuclein and TDP-43, and p62-positive deposits. We performed a systematic mapping of protein deposits in the brains of 27 individuals with documented heroin addiction (age: 19-40 years) and compared with 11 controls (age: 15-40 years). We confirm previous findings that heroin addiction associates with tau hyperphosphorylation in predilection brain areas for aging and Alzheimer disease. Furthermore, we show that this occurs also in areas implicated in the molecular disturbances and in vivo neuronal networks related to heroin abuse. There was, however, no presence of amyloid-beta deposits. We extend previous findings by showing the lack of TDP-43 or alpha-synuclein pathology and emphasize the independent effect of the duration of drug use on the appearance of age-related p62-positive neuritic profiles. These observations provide unique insights about neuropathological alterations in the brains of young heroin addicts and have implications about brain aging and the influences of environmental and toxic factors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available