4.5 Article

Finite-Element and Simplified Models for Collision Simulation between Overheight Trucks and Bridge Superstructures

Journal

JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1140-1151

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000472

Keywords

Bridges; Superstructures; Finite element method; Simulation; Trucks; Traffic accidents; Collision; Bridge superstructure; Finite-element simulation; Simplified model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51222804, 50808106]
  2. Major S&T Special Project of the Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China [2011-318-223-170]
  3. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [2010THZ02-1, 2011THZ03]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0528]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accidental collisions between overheight trucks and bridge superstructures have occurred frequently in recent years. These collisions dramatically affect the safety of bridge structures and traffic systems in metropolitan areas. Frequent collision-induced bridge damages have highlighted the importance of scientific research in this field. In this study, considering the inherent difficulties of full-scale laboratory testing, the FEM is used to simulate the collision procedure. The finite-element (FE) results indicate that collisions between overheight trucks and bridge superstructures induce two types of failure modes, global damage and local damage, which need to be incorporated into bridge design guidelines. The numerical results also reveal that the collision forces are mainly influenced by the parameters associated with overheight trucks. To reduce computational costs and facilitate engineering application, a simplified model for calculating the collision forces is also proposed. The predictions of the simplified model, although slightly conservative, are in good agreement with the FE results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available