4.5 Article

Numerical Evaluation of the Long-Term Behavior of Precast Continuous Bridge Decks

Journal

JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 89-96

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000233

Keywords

Bridge decks; Continuous beams; Precast concrete; Time dependence; Bridge decks; Continuous beams; Precast concrete; Time dependence

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [PTDC/ECM/68430/2006]
  2. Ph.D. grants [SFRH/BD/29125/2006, SFRH/BD/25339/2005]
  3. contractor consortium, TACE
  4. BRISA
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/ECM/68430/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continuous bridge decks constructed with precast girders undergo significant stress changes caused by the concrete delayed deformations because of creep and shrinkage. These effects must be taken into account in the design of new structures. The validation of the analysis procedures should ideally be carried out through the comparison between the calculations and the results observed in real structures. However, experimental results of the construction and long-term behavior of these structures are scarce. The construction of a major bridge in Portugal has provided the opportunity to monitor one such structure. This paper presents the monitoring campaign and the analysis strategy that was developed to assess the long-term variation of strains and stresses in precast continuous bridges. The numerical analysis was validated by comparison with the results observed in the real bridge. The consequences of carrying out simplified analyses based on limited information about the concrete properties and the construction sequence are also evaluated. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000233. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available