4.6 Article

MiR-335-5p Promotes Chondrogenesis in Mouse Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Is Regulated Through Two Positive Feedback Loops

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 1575-1585

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2163

Keywords

MIR-335-5P; MEST; STEM CELL; SOX9; CHONDROGENIC DIFFERENTIATION

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170940, 31070095]
  2. State Basic Science Foundation 973 [2012CB725204]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) [2012AA020503, 2011AA02A201, 2012AA02A700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is regulated by many factors and signal pathways, including transcription factors such as Sox9 and microRNAs. MiR-335-5p has been previously reported to regulate osteogenic and adipogenic differentiations of MSCs, but its role in chondrogenic differentiation of MSC remains unknown. In this study, we found that miR-335-5p and its host gene Mest are co-expressed and greatly upregulated during mouse MSCs (mMSCs) chondrogenesis. Overexpression of miR-335-5p in mMSCs increased expression of chondrogenic marker genes. Molecular mechanism explorations revealed that miR-335-5p targets Daam1 and ROCK1, a set of negative regulators of Sox9; Sox9 downregulates the expression of miR-29a and 29b, both negative regulators of Mest expression, thus forming a positive loop from miR-335-5p to Sox9 to Mest/miR-335-5p. In addition, miR-335-5p targets DKK1 during mMSC chondrogenic differentiation to increase beta-catenin/TCF activity, which leads to increased level of Mest transcription. These data showed miR-335-5p positively regulates MSC chondrogenesis, and two positive feedback loops are identified for the expression of miR-335-5p and its host gene Mest during the early phase of mMSC chondrogenic differentiation. (C) 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available