4.6 Article

Differentiation of high-grade and low-grade diffuse gliomas by intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 132-141

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov147

Keywords

diffusion; glioma; intravoxel incoherent motion; MRI; perfusion

Funding

  1. [80546565]
  2. [26461827]
  3. [40322747]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR imaging for differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs). Forty-five patients with diffuse glioma (age 50.9 +/- 20.4 y; 26 males, 19 females) were assessed with IVIM imaging using 13 b-values (0-1000 s/mm(2)) at 3T. The perfusion fraction (f), true diffusion coefficient (D), and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) were calculated by fitting the bi-exponential model. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was obtained with 2 b-values (0 and 1000 s/mm(2)). Relative cerebral blood volume was measured by the dynamic susceptibility contrast method. Two observers independently measured D, ADC, D*, and f, and these measurements were compared between the LGG group (n = 16) and the HGG group (n = 29). Both D (1.26 +/- 0.37 mm(2)/s in LGG, 0.94 +/- 0.19 mm(2)/s in HGG; P < .001) and ADC (1.28 +/- 0.35 mm(2)/s in LGG, 1.03 +/- 0.19 mm(2)/s in HGG; P < .01) were lower in the HGG group. D was lower than ADC in the LGG (P < .05) and HGG groups (P < .0001). D* was not different between the groups. The f-values were significantly larger in HGG (17.5 +/- 6.3%) than in LGG (5.8 +/- 3.8%; P < .0001) and correlated with relative cerebral blood volume (r = 0.85; P < .0001). Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed areas under curve of 0.95 with f, 0.78 with D, 0.73 with ADC, and 0.60 with D*. IVIM imaging is useful in differentiating HGGs from LGGs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available