4.6 Article

The effect of 3 versus 6 years of Zoledronic acid treatment of osteoporosis: A randomized extension to the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT)

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 243-254

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1494

Keywords

FRACTURE; POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS; ZOLEDRONIC ACID; BISPHOSPHONATES; EXTENSION STUDY

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
  2. Novartis
  3. Merck
  4. Roche
  5. Amgen
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Zosano
  8. Radius
  9. Nycomed
  10. Procter Gamble
  11. Servier
  12. Pfizer
  13. Roche-GlaxoSmithKline
  14. HORIZON Steering Committee
  15. AstraZeneca
  16. GSK
  17. Medtronics
  18. Nastech
  19. Nestle
  20. Fonterra Brands
  21. Ono Pharma
  22. Osteologix
  23. Sanofi Aventis
  24. Tethys
  25. Unilever
  26. Unipath
  27. Inverness Medical
  28. Warner Chilcott

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zoledronic acid 5?mg (ZOL) annually for 3 years reduces fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. To investigate long-term effects of ZOL on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk, the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic acid Once YearlyPivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) was extended to 6 years. In this international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension trial, 1233 postmenopausal women who received ZOL for 3 years in the core study were randomized to 3 additional years of ZOL (Z6, n=616) or placebo (Z3P3, n=617). The primary endpoint was femoral neck (FN) BMD percentage change from year 3 to 6 in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included other BMD sites, fractures, biochemical bone turnover markers, and safety. In years 3 to 6, FN-BMD remained constant in Z6 and dropped slightly in Z3P3 (between-treatment difference=1.04%; 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 1.7; p=0.0009) but remained above pretreatment levels. Other BMD sites showed similar differences. Biochemical markers remained constant in Z6 but rose slightly in Z3P3, remaining well below pretreatment levels in both. New morphometric vertebral fractures were lower in the Z6 (n=14) versus Z3P3 (n=30) group (odds ratio=0.51; p=0.035), whereas other fractures were not different. Significantly more Z6 patients had a transient increase in serum creatinine >0.5 mg/dL (0.65% versus 2.94% in Z3P3). Nonsignificant increases in Z6 of atrial fibrillation serious adverse events (2.0% versus 1.1% in Z3P3; p=0.26) and stroke (3.1% versus 1.5% in Z3P3; p=0.06) were seen. Postdose symptoms were similar in both groups. Reports of hypertension were significantly lower in Z6 versus Z3P3 (7.8% versus 15.1%, p<0.001). Small differences in bone density and markers in those who continued versus those who stopped treatment suggest residual effects, and therefore, after 3 years of annual ZOL, many patients may discontinue therapy up to 3 years. However, vertebral fracture reductions suggest that those at high fracture risk, particularly vertebral fracture, may benefit by continued treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00145327). (C) 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available