4.6 Article

Osteal Macrophages Promote In Vivo Intramembranous Bone Healing in a Mouse Tibial Injury Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 1517-1532

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.354

Keywords

MACROPHAGE; OSTEOBLAST; OSTEOCLAST; OSTEOMAC; BONE FORMATION

Funding

  1. NHMRC [455941, 631484, 409914, 519 744]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone-lining tissues contain a population of resident macrophages termed osteomacs that interact with osteoblasts in vivo and control mineralization in vitro. The role of osteomacs in bone repair was investigated using a mouse tibial bone injury model that heals primarily through intramembranous ossification and progresses through all major phases of stabilized fracture repair. Immunohistochemical studies revealed that at least two macrophage populations, F4/80(+)Mac-2(-/low)TRACP(-) osteomacs and F4/80(+)Mac-2(hi)TRACP(-) inflammatory macrophages, were present within the bone injury site and persisted throughout the healing time course. In vivo depletion of osteomacs/macrophages (either using the Mafia transgenic mouse model or clodronate liposome delivery) or osteoclasts (recombinant osteoprotegerin treatment) established that osteomacs were required for deposition of collagen type 1(+) (CT1(+)) matrix and bone mineralization in the tibial injury model, as assessed by quantitative immunohistology and micro-computed tomography. Conversely, administration of the macrophage growth factor colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) increased the number of osteomacs/macrophages at the injury site significantly with a concurrent increase in new CT1(+) matrix deposition and enhanced mineralization. This study establishes osteomacs as participants in intramembranous bone healing and as targets for primary anabolic bone therapies. (C) 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available