4.6 Article

Prolonged Antiresorptive Activity of Zoledronate: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 2251-2255

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.103

Keywords

ZOLEDRONATE; BONE DENSITY; BONE TURNOVER; OSTEOPOROSIS THERAPY; ANTIRESORPTIVE

Funding

  1. GSK
  2. Novartis
  3. Merck
  4. Procter Gamble
  5. Amgen
  6. Health Research Council of New Zealand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Annual intravenous administration of 5 mg of zoledronate decreases fracture risk over 3 years. The optimal dosing interval of 5 mg of zoledronate is not known. In order to determine the duration of the antiresorptive action of a single 5-mg dose of intravenous zoledronate, we conducted a 3-year double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in a volunteer sample of 50 postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The coprimary endpoints were the bone turnover markers beta-C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (beta-CTX) and serum procollagen type-I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP). Secondary endpoints were bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and total body. After 3 years, mean (95% confidence interval) levels of serum beta-CTX and P1NP were 44% (27-60) and 40% (24%-56%) lower in the zoledronate group (p < .001 versus placebo for each marker). BMD was higher in the zoledronate group than in the placebo group by an average of 6.8% (4.6%-9.1%) at the lumbar spine, 4.0% (1.8%-6.3%) at the total hip, and 2.0% (0.9%-3.0%) at the total body (p < .001 for each skeletal site). Between-group differences in markers of bone turnover and BMD were stable from 12 to 36 months. These data demonstrate that the antiresorptive effects of a single 5-mg dose of zoledronate are sustained for 3 years; clinical trials to investigate the antifracture efficacy of dosing intervals longer than 1 year are justified. (C) 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available