4.6 Article

Bone Structure at the Distal Radius During Adolescent Growth

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1033-1042

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.081255

Keywords

adolescent; BMD; BMC; pQCT

Funding

  1. Thrasher Research Fund
  2. NIH [AR027065, UL1-RR24150]
  3. U.S. Public Health Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of distal forearm fractures peaks during the adolescent growth spurt, but the structural basis for this is unclear. Thus, we studied healthy 6- to 21-yr-old girls (n = 66) and boys (n = 61) using high-resolution pQCT (voxel size, 82 mu m) at the distal radius. Subjects were classified into five groups by bone-age: group I (prepuberty, 6-8 yr), group II (early puberty, 9-11 yr), group III (midpuberty, 12-14 yr), group TV (late puberty, 15-17 yr), and group V (postpuberty, 18-21 yr). Compared with group I, trabecular parameters (bone volume fraction, trabecular number, and thickness) did not change in girls but increased in boys from late puberty onward. Cortical thickness and density decreased from pre- to midpuberty in girls but were unchanged In boys, before rising to higher levels at the end of puberty in both sexes. Total bone strength., assessed using microfinite element models, increased linearly across bone age groups in both sexes, with boys showing greater bone strength than girls after midpuberty. The proportion of load borne by cortical bone, and the ratio of cortical to trabecular bone volume, decreased transiently during mid- to late puberty in both sexes, with apparent cortical porosity peaking during this time. This mirrors the incidence of distal forearm fractures in prior studies. We conclude that regional deficits in cortical bone may underlie the adolescent peak in forearm fractures. Whether these deficits are more severe in children who sustain forearm fractures or persist into later life warrants further study. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:1033-1042. Published online on December 29, 2008; doi: 10.1359/JBMR.081255

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available