4.6 Article

Use of FTIR Spectroscopic Imaging to Identify Parameters Associated With Fragility Fracture

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1565-1571

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.090414

Keywords

bone fracture; bone fragility; collagen cross-links; crystallinity; mineral maturity; multiple logistic regression

Funding

  1. NIH [R01AR041325, P30AR046121, AR049896]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BMD does not entirely explain an individual's risk of fracture. The purpose of this study was to assess whether specific differences in spatially resolved bone composition also contribute to fracture risk. These differences were assessed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging (FTIRI) and analyzed through multiple logistic regression. Models were constructed to determine whether FTIRI measured parameters describing mineral content, mineral crystal size and perfection, and collagen maturity were associated with fracture. Cortical and cancellous bone were independently evaluated in iliac crest biopsies from 54 women (32 with fractures, 22 without) who had significantly different spine but not hip BMDs and ranged in age from 30 to 83 yr. The parameters that were significantly associated with fracture in the model were cortical and cancellous collagen maturity (increased with increased fracture risk), cortical mineral/matrix ratio (higher with increased fracture risk), and cancellous crystallinity (increased with increased fracture risk). As expected, because of its correlation with cortical but not cancellous bone density, hip BMD was significantly associated with fracture risk in the cortical but not the cancellous model. This research suggests that additional parameters associated with fracture risk should be targeted for therapies for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:1565-1571. Published online on April 27, 2009; doi: 10.1359/JBMR.090414

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available