4.6 Article

Bone and Muscle Development During Puberty in Girls: A Seven-Year Longitudinal Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 1693-1698

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.090405

Keywords

BMD; bone growth; girls; muscle cross-sectional area; peak growth velocity time; puberty

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland, Ministry of Education of Finland
  2. University of Jyvaskyla, Juho Vainion Saatio Foundation
  3. ASBMR Bridge Funding Research Grant 2006

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growth of lean mass precedes that of bone mass, suggesting that muscle plays an important role in the growth of bone. However, to date, no study has directly followed the growth of bone and muscle size through puberty and into adulthood. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the growth of muscle size precedes that of bone size (width and length) and mass during puberty. Bone and muscle properties were measured using pQCT and DXA in 258 healthy girls at baseline (mean age, 11.2 yr) and 1-, 2-, 3-4- and 7-yr follow-up. Growth trends as a function of time relative to menarche were determined from prepuberty to early adulthood for tibial length (TL), total cross-sectional area (tCSA), cortical CSA (cCSA), total BMC (tBMC), cortical volumetric BMD (cBMD), and muscle CSA (mCSA) in hierarchical models. The timings of the peak growth velocities for these variables were calculated. Seventy premenopausal adults, comprising a subset of the girl's mothers (mean age, 41.5 yr), were included for comparative purposes. In contrast to our hypothesis, the growth velocity of mCSA peaked 1 yr later than that of tibial outer dimensions (TL and tCSA) and slightly earlier than tBMC. Whereas TL ceased to increase 2 yr after menarche, tCSA, cCSA, tBMC and mCSA continued to increase and were still significantly lower than adult values at the age of 18 yr (all p < 0.01). The results do not support the view that muscle force drives the growth of bone size during puberty. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:1693-1698. Published online on April 27, 2009; doi: 10.1359/JBMR.090405

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available