4.5 Article

Extraction of nanosilica from oil palm leaves and its application as support for lipase immobilization

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages 81-96

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.036

Keywords

Oil palm leaves; Nanosilica; Support matrix; Butyl butyrate; Operational stability

Funding

  1. Research University Grant Scheme from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor [Q.J130000.2526.13H09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reports the preparation of a composite consisting of magnetite coated with nanosilica extracted from oil palm leaves (OPL) ash as nanosupports for immobilization of Candida rugosa lipase (CRL) and its application for the synthesis of butyl butyrate. Results of immobilization parameters showed that similar to 80% of CRL (84.5 mg) initially offered was immobilized onto the surface of the nanosupports to yield a maximum protein loading and specific activity of 67.5 +/- 0.72 mg/g and 320.8 +/- 0.42 U/g of support, respectively. Surface topography, morphology as well as information on surface composition obtained by Raman spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy showed that CRL was successfully immobilized onto the nanosupports, affirming its biocompatibility. Under optimal conditions (3.5 mg/mL protein loading, at 45 degrees C, 3 h and molar ratio 2:1 (1-butanol:n-butyric acid) the CRL/Gl-A-SiO2 MNPs gave a maximum yield of 94 +/- 0.24% butyl butyrate as compared to 84 +/- 0.32% in the lyophilized CRL. CRL/Gl-A-SiO2-MNPs showed an extended operational stability, retaining 50% of its initial activity after 17 consecutive esterification cycles. The results indicated that OPL derived nanosilica coated on magnetite can potentially be employed as carrier for lipase immobilization in replacement of the non-renewable conventionalsilica sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available