4.5 Article

Effect of oil concentration and residence time on the biodegradation of α-pinene vapours in two-liquid phase suspended-growth bioreactors

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue 4, Pages 554-563

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.07.019

Keywords

alpha-Pinene; Biodegradation; Continuous stirred tank bioreactor; Rhodococcus erythropolis; Silicone oil; Two-phase partitioning bioreactor

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTM2007-62700/TECNO]
  2. European FEDER
  3. University of La Coruna (Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, research on the use of binary aqueous-organic liquid phase systems for the treatment of polluted air has significantly increased. This paper reports the removal of a-pinene from a waste air stream in a continuous stirred tank bioreactor (CSTB), using either a single-liquid aqueous phase or a mixed aqueous-organic liquid phase. The influence of gas flow rate, load and pollutant concentration was evaluated as well as the effect of the organic to aqueous phase ratio. Continuous experiments were carried out at different inlet a-pinene concentrations, ranging between 0.03 and 25.1 g m(-3) and at four different flow rates, corresponding to residence times (RTs) of 120 s, 60 s, 36 s and 26 s. The maximum elimination capacities (ECs) reached in the CSTB were 382 g m(-3) h(-1) (without silicone oil) and 608 g m(-3) h(-1) (with 5% v/v silicone oil), corresponding to a 1.6-fold improvement using an aqueous-organic liquid phase. During shock-loads experiments, the performance and stability of the CSTB were enhanced with 5% silicone oil, quickly recovering almost 100% removal efficiency (RE), when pre-shock conditions were restored. The addition of silicone oil acted as a buffer for high a-pinene loads, showing a more stable behaviour in the case of two-liquid-phase systems. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available