4.6 Article

Years of potential life lost for brain and CNS tumors relative to other cancers in adults in the United States, 2010

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 70-77

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov249

Keywords

CBTRUS; central nervous system tumors; NCHS; years of potential life lost

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5U58DP00381-04]
  2. Sontag Foundation
  3. Genentech
  4. Novocure, Inc.
  5. Musella Foundation
  6. Elekta
  7. National Brain Tumor Society
  8. Zelda Dorin Tetenbaum Memorial Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Years of potential life lost (YPLL) complement incidence and survival rates by measuring how much a patient's life is likely to be shortened by his or her cancer. In this study, we examine the impact of death due to brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors compared to other common cancers in adults by investigating the YPLL of adults in the United States. Mortality and life table data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics Vital Statistics Data for 2010. The study population included individuals aged 20 years or older at death who died from one of the selected cancers. YPLL was calculated by taking an individual's age at death and finding the corresponding expected remaining years of life using life table data. The cancers with the greatest mean YPLL were other malignant CNS tumors (20.65), malignant brain tumors (19.93), and pancreatic cancer (15.13) for males and malignant brain tumors (20.31), breast cancer (18.78), and other malignant CNS tumors (18.36) for females. For both sexes, non-Hispanic whites had the lowest YPLL, followed by non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics. Malignant brain and other CNS tumors have the greatest mean YPLL, thereby reflecting their short survival time post diagnosis. These findings will hopefully motivate more research into mitigating the impact of these debilitating tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available