4.5 Article

Comparative analysis of transcriptional activities of heterologous promoters in the rare actinomycete Actinoplanes friuliensis

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 142, Issue 3-4, Pages 200-204

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.05.002

Keywords

Promoter activity; Actinoplanes; Tool development; Rare actinomycetes

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (GenoMik Plus Netzwerk)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manipulation of secondary metabolite production in the rare actinomycete Actinoplanes friuliensis, the producer of the lipopeptide antibiotic friulimicin, is hampered by the lack of sophisticated genetic tools. Since no expression vectors have been developed from endogenous Actinoplanes plasmids and expression signals, engineering of antibiotic biosynthesis relies on the use of vector systems derived from Streptomyces. While Phi C31 derived vectors were shown to integrate efficiently into the chromosome of Actinoplanes, information on promoter activity is missing. The manuscript describes the investigation of several different promoter systems which are widely used in Streptomyces in A. friuliensis by promoter probe experiments using eGFP as a reporter. These experiments indicated that promoter strength in A. friuliensis did not correlate to activity in Streptomyces lividans. The ermE* promoter regarded as one of the strongest promoter in Streptomyces has only low activity in A. friuliensis. In contrast, the promoter of the apramycin resistance gene aac(3)IV, originating from the Gram-negative Escherichia coli had the highest activity. By real-time RT-PCR experiments the transcription activity of ermE* promoter in comparison to a native promoter of the friulimcin biosynthetic gene cluster was analysed. This confirmed the results of the promoter probe experiments that indicated quite weak promoter activity of P-ermE* in Actinoplanes. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available