4.5 Article

Laser-assisted selection and passaging of human pluripotent stem cell colonies

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages 224-230

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.07.002

Keywords

Human embryonic stem cells; Laser microdissection; Non-enzymatic passaging; Cell culture automation; Pluripotency

Funding

  1. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [13N8854]
  2. Hertie Foundation
  3. [HBFG-109-517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The derivation of somatic cell products from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) requires a highly standardized production process with sufficient throughput. To date, the most common technique for hESC passaging is the manual dissection of colonies, which is a gentle, but laborious and time-consuming process and is consequently inappropriate for standardized maintenance of hESC. Here, we present a laser-based technique for the contact-free dissection and isolation of living hESCs (laser microdissection and pressure catapulting. LMPC). Following LMPC treatment, 80.6 +/- 8.7% of the cells remained viable as compared to 88.6 +/- 1.7% of manually dissected hESCs. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the expression of pluripotency-associated markers when compared to the control. Flow cytometry revealed that 83.8 +/- 4.1% of hESCs isolated by LMPC expressed the surface marker Tra-1-60 (control: 83.9 +/- 3.6%). In vitro differentiation potential of LMPC treated hESCs as determined by embryoid body formation and multi-germlayer formation was not impaired. Moreover, we could not detect any overt karyorype alterations as a result of the LMPC process. Our data demonstrate the feasibility of standardized laser-based passaging of hESC cultures. This technology should facilitate both colony selection and maintenance culture of pluripotent stem cells. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available