4.4 Article

Characteristics of heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification bacterium Acinetobacter sp. T1 and its application for pig farm wastewater treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages 201-205

Publisher

SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.07.025

Keywords

Acinetobacter sp. T1; Aerobic denitrification; Full scale plant; Heterotrophic nitrification; Nitrogen removal; Pig farm wastewater

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708561]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2015CFC888]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, South-Central University for Nationalities [CZP17097, CZW15075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel heterotrophic bacterium was isolated from activated sludge of a pig farm wastewater treatment plant and identified as Acinetobacter sp. T1. It exhibited efficient heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification capability to utilize ammonium, nitrate or nitrite as the sole nitrogen source, and their removal rates were 12.08, 5.53 and 1.69 mg/L/h, respectively. Furthermore, the optimal conditions for the heterotrophic nitrification process were sodium citrate as the carbon source, C/N mass ratio of 10, pH of 8.5 and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration of 5.1 mg/L. Only trace amounts of nitrate and nitrite were observed during the process. When the aerobic tank of the A(2)O process of a pig farm wastewater treatment plant was inoculated with traditional activated sludge, the average removals of COD, NH4+-N and TN in the effluent were 30%, 15% and 16%, respectively, which was much lower than that of inoculated with strain T1, the increase was statistically significant, indicating a great potential of strain T1 for full-scale applications. (C) 2018, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available