4.4 Article

Trehalose suppresses antibody aggregation during the culture of Chinese hamster ovary cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 117, Issue 5, Pages 632-638

Publisher

SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.10.022

Keywords

Chinese hamster ovary cell; Cell culture; Antibody production; Antibody aggregation; Chemical chaperone; Trehalose; Bispecific diabody

Funding

  1. Advanced Research for Medical Products Mining Programme of the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26630433, 24000011, 25870476] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aggregation of therapeutic antibodies during the manufacturing process is problematic because of the potential risks posed by the aggregates, such as an unexpected immune response. One of the hallmark effects of trehalose, a disaccharide consisting of two alpha-glucose units, is as a chemical chaperone with anti-aggregation activity. In this study, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line producing a diabody-type bispecific antibody were cultured in medium containing trehalose and the aggregation of the secreted proteins during the culture process was analyzed. An analysis of the various forms of the antibody (monomeric, dimeric, and large aggregates) showed that trehalose decreased the relative content of large aggregates by two thirds. The aggregation kinetics indicated that trehalose directly inhibited the polymerization and aggregation steps in a nucleation-dependent aggregation mechanism. Moreover, both specific and volumetric antibody production were increased in CHO cells cultured in trehalose-containing medium. Thus, the addition of trehalose to recombinant CHO cell cultures would offer a practical strategy for quality improvement in the production of therapeutic antibodies. (C) 2013, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available