4.4 Article

Genetic manipulations restored the growth fitness of reduced-genome Escherichia coli

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages 52-58

Publisher

SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.01.010

Keywords

Escherichia coli; Genome reduction; Metabolic engineering; Synthetic biology; Molecular breeding

Funding

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization of Japan (NEDO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbes with smaller genomes would be better chassis for analysis, design, and improvement in the fields of metabolic engineering, synthetic biology, and molecular breeding. To create an Escherichia coli strain with a smaller genome, we used a stepwise genome reduction approach. Beginning with strain MGF-01, which has a genome of 3.62 megabase pairs (Mbp), we generated two E. coli K-12 strains without any insertion sequence (IS), DGF-327 and DGF-298, with reduced genome sizes of 3.27 and 2.98 Mbp, respectively. During the strain construction, intrinsic mutations of ilvG and rph were functionally restored to accelerate initial growth after inoculation. The genomes of the two strains were sequenced, and their structures were confirmed. Both strains showed no auxotrophy, and had better growth fitness, especially in the initial phase, and better cell yield in a rich medium than the wild type K-12 strain. Transcriptome analysis revealed that ibpAB and Ion, which encode a heat-shock chaperone and a protease for abnormal proteins, respectively, are down-regulated in DGF strains, compared to the ancestral strains with larger genomes. We concluded that down-regulation of the genes encoding chaperones and proteases is one of the factors that improve the fitness of DGF strains. The DGF strains with fewer genes and better cell yield will be good hosts for applications. (C) 2013, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available