4.6 Article

Classification of fixed urological cells using Raman tweezers

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS
Volume 2, Issue 1-2, Pages 47-69

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.200810061

Keywords

Raman tweezers; vibrational spectroscopy; prostate cancer; chemometrics; cell fixation; cytology

Funding

  1. Prostate Cancer Research Foundation (PCRF
  2. Medical Research Council [G0500966] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0500966] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we report on preliminary investigations into using Raman tweezers to classify urological cell lines. This builds on earlier work within the group, whereby Raman tweezer methodologies were developed, and the application of this technique to differentiate between live prostate cancer (CaP) and bladder cells lines (PC-3 and MGH-U1 respectively) was demonstrated. In this present study we analysed chemically fixed cells using two different fixative methods; Surepath (TM) (a commercial available liquid based cytology media) and 4% v/v formalin/PBS fixatives. The study has been expanded from our previous live cell study to include the androgen sensitive CaP cell line LNCaP, primary benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) cells as well as primary urethral cells. Raman light from the cells was collected using a 514.5 nm Ar-ion laser excitation source in a back-scattering configuration mode. Principal component-linear discriminate analysis (PC-LDA) models of resulting cell spectra were generated and these were validated using a blind comparison. Sensitivities and specificities of >72% and 90% respectively, for SurePath fixed cells and >93% and 98% respectively for 4% v/v formalin/PBS fixed cells was achieved. The higher prediction results for the formalin fixed cells can be attributed to a better signal-to-noise ratio for spectra obtained from these cells. Following on from this work, urological cell lines were exposed to urine for up to 12 hours to determine the effect of urine on the ability to classify these cells. Results indicate that urine has no detrimental effect on prediction results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available