4.1 Article

MINIMIZING THE MAXIMUM EXPECTED SAMPLE SIZE IN TWO-STAGE PHASE II CLINICAL TRIALS WITH CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 836-852

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2010.528104

Keywords

Minimax design; Optimal design; Two-stage designs

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council [G08008600, U.1052.00.014]
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_EX_G0800860] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_EX_G0800860] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-stage designs are commonly used for Phase II trials. Optimal two-stage designs have the lowest expected sample size for a specific treatment effect, for example, the null value, but can perform poorly if the true treatment effect differs. Here we introduce a design for continuous treatment responses that minimizes the maximum expected sample size across all possible treatment effects. The proposed design performs well for a wider range of treatment effects and so is useful for Phase II trials. We compare the design to a previously used optimal design and show it has superior expected sample size properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available